top of page

Seven Wordles Speedrun War

  • Jun 6, 2022
  • 4 min read

Updated: Jun 7, 2022

My last time [of 70.02] felt beatable, but to be perfectly honest, this one feels like everything fell into place perfectly, so I would be highly impressed. –The version of Jacob who wrote my last blog post, who is to become highly impressed

I got a 58.16 on Seven Wordles! The game adds three seconds for every wrong guess, so that equates to 17 seconds real time, or about two and a half seconds a Wordle.

I wasn't planning to do more Wordle speedrunning after my last blog post, but on May 8, friend of the blog Prismatic got a time of 68.51, beating my personal record of 70.02.

On May 10, I got a 68.06.

On May 12, he got a 63.60.

On May 18, I got a 63.01.

On May 21, he got a 60.38.

And finally, yesterday, June 5, I got a 58.16.


I don't think it's actually the world record. I discovered a Wordle speedrunning Discord. Fortunately (for my record), they don't really do Seven Wordles much—they're into Speedle especially. I haven't seen video proof of a better run than mine, but I believe a user named egg, who has the Speedle record, said they got a 58.01.


I know that's only a 0.15-second gap, but this has consumed a lot of my spare time, so I really do intend to stop at this point. If Prismatic beats the record (which I think is likely if he keeps trying), I will not challenge it.

If Prismatic beats the record (which I think is likely if he keeps trying), I will not challenge it.

Anyway, finding this community was just a reminder to me that I don't know everyone on the internet, and there might be a better Wordle time out there.


[EDIT: The day after I published this, Prismatic did in fact beat the record! And with a 55.81: one of the words was SPILT. Also, he came out on the wrong side of a 50-50 at the end; if the last word had been CHASM instead of CHAOS it would've been sub-52. Regardless, very impressive and lucky!]


(By the way, I did look into creating a speedrun.com category for seven wordles, but that site prefers more substantial games, stating that the game "should have a reasonable length such as 5 minutes or longer as a casual playthrough.")

Okay, with that out of the way. How did I do it?


I won't lie, typing speed is a factor, as is luck. But there's also some strategy.


I continued to use my SPILT/CRANE strategy, a pair of words optimized for making as many words as possible uniquely determined. (You can get slightly better coverage if you use words that are not in the answer list, but I like having that slim chance of getting it in one.)


I used my program to tell me all the words that were uniquely determined after only SPILT, and tried to memorize them, with reasonably success. However, I was terrible at putting this memorization into practice. It felt like a for majority of times these words came up, I would type CRANE out of muscle memory only to realize it was TULIP, APTLY, SILLY, or one of the others, and be annoyed at my wasted guess.


Also, one time? My first word was actually SPILT. And my fingers, in their infinite wisdom, were so caught off guard that they decided to restart.


Anyway, in my ultimate speedrun, I got every word on three—no ones or twos to help me out. (A feat which, ironically, Prismatic speculated was implausible that day.) Last time, all of my threes but one were uniquely determined by then, but this time the opposite was true.

The chance of getting this lucky on all of them was 1 in 5*4*2*5*2*6*1=2400, which is pretty ridiculous.

LEECH could've been BELCH, EXCEL, FLECK, or WELCH.

PARER could've been PAPER, PAYER, or REPAY. (Don't know what possessed me to guess it.)

LATCH could've been OCTAL.

TACKY could've been BATCH, HATCH, MATCH, or WATCH.

SHEEP could've been SWEEP.

STOOD could've been SOOTH, SOOTY, SOUTH, STUDY, or STUFF.

Only LEASE was unique.


The chance of getting this lucky on all of them was 1 in 5*4*2*5*2*6*1=2400, which is pretty ridiculous. It is true that I've done a lot of resetting when the first few words don't go well, but it was still quite improbable.


Also, My Program Had a Minor Bug

The bug only affected a small number of cases, but was in a very basic function: the one that compares guesses to answers. It used to be that (to give an example) if SPILT was the word, and you guessed STILT, it would give you a yellow on the first T instead of a green on the second.


Essentially, it would calculate the colors of the letters in order, which is normally correct behavior—if the word was SPITE, the first T should be yellow but not the second. Unfortunately, a later green has priority over an earlier yellow. It never comes up when you guess words with no repeated letters, though, which I was mostly doing.


In Conclusion

I don't have too much else to say this time around! I think it's been the longest ever gap between this and my last blog post, and my most recent three blog posts are now all Wordle-related. I think that's going to change! I don't want to promise anything spectacular, but I have some topic ideas, and now that it's summer, I should have some more free time to actually write them.


Talk to you all then. Thanks for reading, as always, and the best of luck to anyone who wants to speedrun Wordle!

—Jacob


PS: Here's a custom wordle! Enjoy.

180 Comments


HongCunge8dlis
9 hours ago

Tôi thường ưu tiên những bài giới thiệu nền tảng giải trí được viết ngắn gọn, rõ ràng để có thể đọc nhanh trên điện thoại mà vẫn nắm đủ thông tin chính. Phần nhắc đến U888 được đặt ở giữa bài nên mạch nội dung khá tự nhiên, không tạo cảm giác quảng bá quá sớm. Nội dung bài viết thiên về trải nghiệm người dùng với giao diện trực quan và cách bố trí các danh mục khá hợp lý. Tổng thể bài viết không quá dài nên khá thuận tiện để tham khảo nhanh.

Like

Lemi Brzozowski
Lemi Brzozowski
2 days ago

Mình thấy giao diện của RR88 khá sáng và dễ nhìn. Cách bố trí danh mục cũng đơn giản nên khi lướt qua tạo cảm giác mượt mà, không bị rối mắt như nhiều nền tảng khác. Các mục được sắp xếp rõ ràng, thao tác chuyển trang nhanh nên trải nghiệm tổng thể khá ổn trên cả điện thoại lẫn máy tính.

Like

Lauro Sanderson
Lauro Sanderson
2 days ago

Sáng nay mình đọc các trao đổi trên mạng thì thấy một người nhắc tới haywin, giữa cuộc trò chuyện, nên mình cũng bấm vào xem qua. Mình không tìm hiểu sâu, chỉ xem nhanh để nhìn bố cục và cách nội dung được sắp xếp tổng thể. Xong xuôi mình quay lại bài viết ban đầu để tiếp tục đọc bình luận.

Like

HongCunge8dlis
3 days ago

Khi truy cập vào live casino và game bài, mình thấy tốc độ phản hồi khá đều. Trong quá trình đọc thêm thông tin về 68GB mình nhận thấy hệ thống còn tích hợp thêm slot, esport và thể thao nên tạo cảm giác đầy đủ hơn. Các danh mục được phân chia rõ nên không mất nhiều thời gian làm quen. Cá nhân mình cảm thấy tổng thể được tổ chức khá hợp lý.

Like

jason98400650@gmail.com 98400650
jason98400650@gmail.com 98400650
3 days ago

Khi xem qua một vài chia sẻ gần đây, mình để ý thấy BL555 nên tò mò ghé vào xem thử. Mình chỉ dành chút thời gian xem cách bố trí và trình bày tổng thể chứ chưa đọc kỹ nội dung. Ấn tượng ban đầu là trang được sắp xếp khá hợp lý, nhìn chung gọn gàng và dễ theo dõi.

Like

Logo art: The Magic: The Gathering card "Mindshrieker" illustrated by Dave Kendall. It's not that good or interesting a card, I've just always loved the art! 

 

©2019-23 by Chromatic Conflux. Created with Wix.com

bottom of page