top of page

Seven Wordles Speedrun War

  • Jun 6, 2022
  • 4 min read

Updated: Jun 7, 2022

My last time [of 70.02] felt beatable, but to be perfectly honest, this one feels like everything fell into place perfectly, so I would be highly impressed. –The version of Jacob who wrote my last blog post, who is to become highly impressed

I got a 58.16 on Seven Wordles! The game adds three seconds for every wrong guess, so that equates to 17 seconds real time, or about two and a half seconds a Wordle.

I wasn't planning to do more Wordle speedrunning after my last blog post, but on May 8, friend of the blog Prismatic got a time of 68.51, beating my personal record of 70.02.

On May 10, I got a 68.06.

On May 12, he got a 63.60.

On May 18, I got a 63.01.

On May 21, he got a 60.38.

And finally, yesterday, June 5, I got a 58.16.


I don't think it's actually the world record. I discovered a Wordle speedrunning Discord. Fortunately (for my record), they don't really do Seven Wordles much—they're into Speedle especially. I haven't seen video proof of a better run than mine, but I believe a user named egg, who has the Speedle record, said they got a 58.01.


I know that's only a 0.15-second gap, but this has consumed a lot of my spare time, so I really do intend to stop at this point. If Prismatic beats the record (which I think is likely if he keeps trying), I will not challenge it.

If Prismatic beats the record (which I think is likely if he keeps trying), I will not challenge it.

Anyway, finding this community was just a reminder to me that I don't know everyone on the internet, and there might be a better Wordle time out there.


[EDIT: The day after I published this, Prismatic did in fact beat the record! And with a 55.81: one of the words was SPILT. Also, he came out on the wrong side of a 50-50 at the end; if the last word had been CHASM instead of CHAOS it would've been sub-52. Regardless, very impressive and lucky!]


(By the way, I did look into creating a speedrun.com category for seven wordles, but that site prefers more substantial games, stating that the game "should have a reasonable length such as 5 minutes or longer as a casual playthrough.")

Okay, with that out of the way. How did I do it?


I won't lie, typing speed is a factor, as is luck. But there's also some strategy.


I continued to use my SPILT/CRANE strategy, a pair of words optimized for making as many words as possible uniquely determined. (You can get slightly better coverage if you use words that are not in the answer list, but I like having that slim chance of getting it in one.)


I used my program to tell me all the words that were uniquely determined after only SPILT, and tried to memorize them, with reasonably success. However, I was terrible at putting this memorization into practice. It felt like a for majority of times these words came up, I would type CRANE out of muscle memory only to realize it was TULIP, APTLY, SILLY, or one of the others, and be annoyed at my wasted guess.


Also, one time? My first word was actually SPILT. And my fingers, in their infinite wisdom, were so caught off guard that they decided to restart.


Anyway, in my ultimate speedrun, I got every word on three—no ones or twos to help me out. (A feat which, ironically, Prismatic speculated was implausible that day.) Last time, all of my threes but one were uniquely determined by then, but this time the opposite was true.

The chance of getting this lucky on all of them was 1 in 5*4*2*5*2*6*1=2400, which is pretty ridiculous.

LEECH could've been BELCH, EXCEL, FLECK, or WELCH.

PARER could've been PAPER, PAYER, or REPAY. (Don't know what possessed me to guess it.)

LATCH could've been OCTAL.

TACKY could've been BATCH, HATCH, MATCH, or WATCH.

SHEEP could've been SWEEP.

STOOD could've been SOOTH, SOOTY, SOUTH, STUDY, or STUFF.

Only LEASE was unique.


The chance of getting this lucky on all of them was 1 in 5*4*2*5*2*6*1=2400, which is pretty ridiculous. It is true that I've done a lot of resetting when the first few words don't go well, but it was still quite improbable.


Also, My Program Had a Minor Bug

The bug only affected a small number of cases, but was in a very basic function: the one that compares guesses to answers. It used to be that (to give an example) if SPILT was the word, and you guessed STILT, it would give you a yellow on the first T instead of a green on the second.


Essentially, it would calculate the colors of the letters in order, which is normally correct behavior—if the word was SPITE, the first T should be yellow but not the second. Unfortunately, a later green has priority over an earlier yellow. It never comes up when you guess words with no repeated letters, though, which I was mostly doing.


In Conclusion

I don't have too much else to say this time around! I think it's been the longest ever gap between this and my last blog post, and my most recent three blog posts are now all Wordle-related. I think that's going to change! I don't want to promise anything spectacular, but I have some topic ideas, and now that it's summer, I should have some more free time to actually write them.


Talk to you all then. Thanks for reading, as always, and the best of luck to anyone who wants to speedrun Wordle!

—Jacob


PS: Here's a custom wordle! Enjoy.

364 Comments


Giang APho
Giang APho
a day ago

GO8 Sau khi thấy website này xuất hiện trong phần gợi ý, mình mở vào xem thử để tham khảo cách họ xây dựng giao diện. Điều mình chú ý đầu tiên là các khu vực trên trang được sắp xếp khá hợp lý, mỗi phần đều có tiêu đề rõ ràng nên việc theo dõi nội dung không gặp nhiều khó khăn. Cách phân chia danh mục cũng khá trực quan, giúp người dùng mới nhanh chóng xác định được khu vực cần truy cập. Trong quá trình trải nghiệm, tốc độ tải trang ổn định, thao tác chuyển đổi giữa các mục diễn ra mượt và không gặp tình trạng giật hay chậm phản hồi. Khi sử dụng trên…

Like

camelia86mari
2 days ago

That's an incredible Wordle achievement! A sub-60-second Seven Wordles run takes serious speed, pattern recognition, and quick decision-making. Congrats on the impressive record!

Like

Koda Chan
Koda Chan
2 days ago

Bữa mình lướt thấy 789 club đâu đó nên bấm vào xem thử cho biết thôi. Không có đọc kỹ nội dung, chủ yếu ngó giao diện với cách họ chia mục có dễ tìm không. Cảm giác là trang làm khá “lean”, nhìn cái menu với mấy khối nội dung là hiểu họ muốn người dùng đi theo hướng nào, không bị nhồi chữ quá. Mình cũng để ý họ có để phần thông tin giấy phép pháp lý khá lộ trên trang, ai cần kiểm tra thì thấy ngay chứ không phải kéo mò mệt. Nói chung lướt vài phút cũng không bị rối mắt

Like

tranthanhan92290
2 days ago

https://kubetxl.com/ mình có ghé vào xem thử sau khi thấy được nhắc đến trong một vài nội dung trên mạng, chủ yếu để tham khảo cách họ thiết kế giao diện và bố trí thông tin. Mình chỉ xem nhanh tổng thể nên chưa tìm hiểu sâu, nhưng có thể thấy các phần được chia khá rõ ràng, nhìn vào không bị rối mắt. Nội dung hiển thị gọn gàng, các khu vực sắp xếp hợp lý nên việc theo dõi khá thuận tiện. Khi truy cập trên điện thoại, trang vẫn hoạt động ổn định, thao tác tương đối mượt. Tổng thể mang lại cảm giác đơn giản và dễ dùng

Like

hhhhhhhhg76
3 days ago

Trong quá trình đọc các thảo luận, mình có để ý thấy https://f8betn.net/ được nhắc qua nên thử vào xem cho biết. Mình chỉ xem nhanh tổng thể chứ chưa tìm hiểu sâu, nhưng cảm giác ban đầu là cách trình bày khá thoáng, bố cục rõ ràng, nhìn vào không bị rối mắt.

Like

Logo art: The Magic: The Gathering card "Mindshrieker" illustrated by Dave Kendall. It's not that good or interesting a card, I've just always loved the art! 

 

©2019-23 by Chromatic Conflux. Created with Wix.com

bottom of page