top of page

Seven Wordles Speedrun War

Jun 6, 2022
4 min read

Updated: Jun 7, 2022

My last time [of 70.02] felt beatable, but to be perfectly honest, this one feels like everything fell into place perfectly, so I would be highly impressed. –The version of Jacob who wrote my last blog post, who is to become highly impressed

I got a 58.16 on Seven Wordles! The game adds three seconds for every wrong guess, so that equates to 17 seconds real time, or about two and a half seconds a Wordle.

I wasn't planning to do more Wordle speedrunning after my last blog post, but on May 8, friend of the blog Prismatic got a time of 68.51, beating my personal record of 70.02.

On May 10, I got a 68.06.

On May 12, he got a 63.60.

On May 18, I got a 63.01.

On May 21, he got a 60.38.

And finally, yesterday, June 5, I got a 58.16.


I don't think it's actually the world record. I discovered a Wordle speedrunning Discord. Fortunately (for my record), they don't really do Seven Wordles much—they're into Speedle especially. I haven't seen video proof of a better run than mine, but I believe a user named egg, who has the Speedle record, said they got a 58.01.


I know that's only a 0.15-second gap, but this has consumed a lot of my spare time, so I really do intend to stop at this point. If Prismatic beats the record (which I think is likely if he keeps trying), I will not challenge it.

If Prismatic beats the record (which I think is likely if he keeps trying), I will not challenge it.

Anyway, finding this community was just a reminder to me that I don't know everyone on the internet, and there might be a better Wordle time out there.


[EDIT: The day after I published this, Prismatic did in fact beat the record! And with a 55.81: one of the words was SPILT. Also, he came out on the wrong side of a 50-50 at the end; if the last word had been CHASM instead of CHAOS it would've been sub-52. Regardless, very impressive and lucky!]


(By the way, I did look into creating a speedrun.com category for seven wordles, but that site prefers more substantial games, stating that the game "should have a reasonable length such as 5 minutes or longer as a casual playthrough.")

Okay, with that out of the way. How did I do it?


I won't lie, typing speed is a factor, as is luck. But there's also some strategy.


I continued to use my SPILT/CRANE strategy, a pair of words optimized for making as many words as possible uniquely determined. (You can get slightly better coverage if you use words that are not in the answer list, but I like having that slim chance of getting it in one.)


I used my program to tell me all the words that were uniquely determined after only SPILT, and tried to memorize them, with reasonably success. However, I was terrible at putting this memorization into practice. It felt like a for majority of times these words came up, I would type CRANE out of muscle memory only to realize it was TULIP, APTLY, SILLY, or one of the others, and be annoyed at my wasted guess.


Also, one time? My first word was actually SPILT. And my fingers, in their infinite wisdom, were so caught off guard that they decided to restart.


Anyway, in my ultimate speedrun, I got every word on three—no ones or twos to help me out. (A feat which, ironically, Prismatic speculated was implausible that day.) Last time, all of my threes but one were uniquely determined by then, but this time the opposite was true.

The chance of getting this lucky on all of them was 1 in 5*4*2*5*2*6*1=2400, which is pretty ridiculous.

LEECH could've been BELCH, EXCEL, FLECK, or WELCH.

PARER could've been PAPER, PAYER, or REPAY. (Don't know what possessed me to guess it.)

LATCH could've been OCTAL.

TACKY could've been BATCH, HATCH, MATCH, or WATCH.

SHEEP could've been SWEEP.

STOOD could've been SOOTH, SOOTY, SOUTH, STUDY, or STUFF.

Only LEASE was unique.


The chance of getting this lucky on all of them was 1 in 5*4*2*5*2*6*1=2400, which is pretty ridiculous. It is true that I've done a lot of resetting when the first few words don't go well, but it was still quite improbable.


Also, My Program Had a Minor Bug

The bug only affected a small number of cases, but was in a very basic function: the one that compares guesses to answers. It used to be that (to give an example) if SPILT was the word, and you guessed STILT, it would give you a yellow on the first T instead of a green on the second.


Essentially, it would calculate the colors of the letters in order, which is normally correct behavior—if the word was SPITE, the first T should be yellow but not the second. Unfortunately, a later green has priority over an earlier yellow. It never comes up when you guess words with no repeated letters, though, which I was mostly doing.


In Conclusion

I don't have too much else to say this time around! I think it's been the longest ever gap between this and my last blog post, and my most recent three blog posts are now all Wordle-related. I think that's going to change! I don't want to promise anything spectacular, but I have some topic ideas, and now that it's summer, I should have some more free time to actually write them.


Talk to you all then. Thanks for reading, as always, and the best of luck to anyone who wants to speedrun Wordle!

—Jacob


PS: Here's a custom wordle! Enjoy.

785 Comments


hhhhhhhhg76
19 hours ago

Khi đọc các bài giới thiệu nền tảng giải trí, tôi thường thích những bài viết ngắn gọn để có thể xem nhanh trên điện thoại. Bài viết này có bố cục khá dễ theo dõi khi phần nhắc đến LUCK8 được đặt ở giữa nội dung. Điều đó giúp mạch bài trở nên tự nhiên hơn và không tạo cảm giác quảng cáo quá sớm. Nội dung tập trung vào trải nghiệm chung của người dùng với giao diện dễ sử dụng và nhiều danh mục quen thuộc như slot, game bài hay mini game. Nhìn chung cách diễn đạt khá nhẹ nhàng và dễ hiểu.

Like

289
289
20 hours ago

cổng game ao88 là cái tên mình tình cờ thấy trong lúc đọc vài bài chia sẻ. Mình vào xem qua thì thấy giao diện khá sáng sủa, các mục được chia tương đối hợp lý. Phần menu dễ nhìn nên việc tìm và chuyển sang chuyên mục khác cũng khá nhanh. Tổng thể mang cảm giác đơn giản, không quá nhiều chi tiết.

Like

289
289
20 hours ago

nhà cái v8win được mình biết đến khi đọc một vài chia sẻ trên mạng rồi vào xem thử. Giao diện nhìn khá thoáng, các chuyên mục được sắp xếp thành từng khu vực nên dễ theo dõi. Thanh điều hướng cũng bố trí khá rõ, chuyển qua lại giữa các mục không mất nhiều thời gian. Nhìn chung, cách trình bày khá đơn giản và dễ làm quen

Like

hhhhhhhhg76
2 days ago

Tối qua mình đọc các bình luận trao đổi trên một diễn đàn, mình bắt gặp uy88.coach chèn vào giữa câu chuyện. Mình bấm thử xem cho biết, chủ yếu là để xem cách trình bày và cấu trúc nội dung. Lướt nhanh thì thấy tổng thể khá gọn gàng, tạo cảm giác đáng tin cậy. Xem qua xong mình quay lại theo dõi phần thảo luận.

Like

Gem 88
Gem 88
2 days ago

H19 được nhắc đến khi đang đọc một vài chia sẻ trên mạng nên cũng mở vào xem thử. Mình không dành nhiều thời gian khám phá hết các nội dung, chủ yếu xem cách họ bố trí giao diện và phân chia các chuyên mục. Ấn tượng đầu tiên là bố cục được làm khá mạch lạc, các phần thông tin được sắp xếp theo từng nhóm nên nhìn tổng thể khá dễ theo dõi và không tạo cảm giác quá nhiều nội dung dồn vào một chỗ. Mình cũng để ý việc di chuyển giữa các mục khá thuận tiện nhờ thanh điều hướng được bố trí rõ ràng.

Like

Logo art: The Magic: The Gathering card "Mindshrieker" illustrated by Dave Kendall. It's not that good or interesting a card, I've just always loved the art! 

 

©2019-23 by Chromatic Conflux. Created with Wix.com

bottom of page